The Works of George Santayana

Category: LETTERS Page 160 of 274

Letters in Limbo ~ February 16,1907

Charles_W._Eliot_cph.3a02149To Charles William Eliot
75 Monmouth Street
COLONIAL CLUB.
Brookline, Massachusetts. February 16, 1907

Dear Mr Eliot,

At a meeting of the Philosophical Division held this afternoon a question came up about a proposed course of mine which it was agreed should be submitted to you for decision. Some time ago Professor Schofield asked me if I would offer some course in his department. I answered “Yes”, and suggested one on “Three philosophical poets—Lucretius Dante, and Goethe”—a half-course in which the conception of the world and the moral sentiment of the three should be described and compared. Professor Schofield accepted this idea. Now the Philosophical Department seems to be of opinion that this half-course should be given under their auspices, and not in the department of comparative literature. They add that if a part of my work is to lie in another department, a part of my salary too should be regarded as coming from that quarter, and a corresponding sum should be set free for the uses of the philosophical division.

To me it is a matter of indifference in which part of the pamphlet my proposed course figures, except that it is meant for the student of literature rather than for the technical philosopher, and that the requirement of a previous course in philosophy (usually made in offering our philosophical courses) would be out of place in this instance. Should I withdraw my offer made to Professor Schofield and should the proposed course be announced under the head of philosophy?

At our meeting this afternoon it was voted, as Professor Perry will doubtless report to you, that the Corporation be asked to appoint a well-known professor to fill Professor James’s place. I concur heartily in this desire, but if such an appointment were made “over my head” and previous to my own promotion, I should not regard my position as satisfactory.

Yours sincerely, G Santayana

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book One, [1868]-1909.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2001.
Location of manuscript: Harvard Archives, Harvard University, Cambridge MA

Letters in Limbo ~ February 15, 1939

by Lafayette (Lafayette Ltd), half-plate nitrate negative, 6 January 1932

To Boylston Adams Beal
Hotel Bristol
Rome. February 15, 1939

Thank you very much for your extraordinarily kind, sympathetic, and clear-sighted letter about Howgate’s book. Naturally I feel at least as much as you do the lack of any inward understanding. Perhaps the way one man feels the world and his own interests is not communicable beyond a very few friends and contemporaries who lived in the same places, and thought in the same way. We belong to the 1880’s and 1890’s, and that, for the men of today, is a long time ago. I have been reading a book of E. Beresford Chancellor’s about the Regency, and early Victorian times in London; it is thoroughly well informed and good-natured, yet I am sure Beau Brummel and George IV and the rest would not recognize one motive or one sentiment of their own in these portraits. And if a great novelist, not a mere retailer of anecdotes like Chancellor, took up the task, of course he would merely create plausible (or as they say, living) characters of his own, entirely unlike, inwardly, what the real people had been. This is so patent to a reader of history or philosophy, that I often wonder why the ancients cared so much about fame, and talked as if it could rescue them from death and oblivion. It rescues only their names, and some reports about events in their lives; but the quality of life, as they knew it, can’t be recreated. . . . he [Howgate] doesn.t work from the inside outwards but from the outside inwards, so that he misses the life of the whole and sometimes, as in my sonnets, finds two ladies who were not there. As you say again, he has little sense of humour, little dramatic sense. He is a professor of English, I believe; certainly not a deep philosopher, although competent in a commonplace way; and he studies my style and its defects very earnestly and judiciously, revealing things to me that sometimes I had never perceived. You know that I don.t regard myself as a poet in the English sense of the word: but I have always written verse easily and with great gusto, Latin fashion, and one can put into that kind of rhetoric very genuine thoughts and feelings. But here again, they are imagined thoughts and feelings, spontaneous fictions, not reports of convictions or facts previously arrived at. So that the merry, the artistic, side of such poetry is missed by a critic who expects personal self-revelations or religious conclusions only, to help him write the biography of his author.

George Sturgis, who oddly enough was a friend of Swelly Bangs, had written to me of his death.4 I wonder if he retained his heartiness and jovial aristocratic tolerance for mankind, through so many later years and so much contact with the dominant currents in the world. Hardly possible. But he was a jolly young man, and wise in his mind and temper in those early days. I shall never forget the evenings when he and Bob Barlow took me to supper at the Zeta Psi, in the old house in Church Street, where the dining-room was like the cabin of some old frigate, and the songs and stories were worthy of Captain Marryat and his crew. This, and other glimpses of mannish society which I had in those days, helped to enlarge my sympathies; and something may have filtered through into my novel.

I wish you could turn up here. The depression and dismay which seems to fill the rest of the world are not to be felt here. I don’t know what difficulties there may be beneath the surface; but to a casual observer like me everything seems prospering and joyful; old things being pulled down–ugly old things–and new things built, which if not beautiful are at least frank, clean, large, and solid. I was never happier than I am here and now. The Spanish cloud seems to be receding rapidly. My friends in Spain are most enthusiastic, heralding a new dawn, and full of courage and confidence. One of my sister’s step-grandsons has been killed; but several others in the army are doing well, although of course everybody has suffered financial loss and great anxiety. But we are not afraid of the Jews or the French or even the Eng-lish, who like America seem to rule the world but are having hopeless troubles at home, even in Palestine!

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book Six, 1937-1940.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2004.
Location of manuscript: The Houghton Library, Harvard University, Cambridge MA

Letters in Limbo ~ February 14, 1939

george-santayanaTo Paul Arthur Schilpp
Hotel Bristol
Rome. February 14, 1939

As to a possible volume on me. Here I see there are going to be many difficulties and perhaps misunderstandings, and I feel that we had better at least postpone that project. I am now at work on the Realm of Spirit, my last word, as it were, and find it a most difficult book to put into proper shape, partly no doubt because my power of synthesis and system, never very great, has diminished with age. While this is pending, I can.t promise to do any other considerable task. If and when it is done, I might feel differently. . . . let us put off this . . . project to some later time. You doubtless have a sufficient list of living philosophers to occupy you for a year or two, and then, if I am still alive, you can reopen the question.

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book Six, 1937-1940.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2004.
Location of manuscript: Morris Library, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale

Letters in Limbo ~ [1942]

rome2To Mercedes de la Escalera
[Rome.] [1942]

Many thanks for your having given me the message from George. When you write to him, tell him that I continue in good health, that I received (with seven months’ delay) the letter that came in care of the Spanish Embassy and that I am grateful for his efforts. I do not need money at present, and if I should need some, I believe that there would be means of getting it here as I have relations with some Italians who are familiar with my situation and who could supply me with the modest sums that I would need. In spite of everything I am contented, so much so that I believe that old age is the happiest part of my life.

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book Seven, 1941-1947.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006.
Location of manuscript: Unknown

Letters in Limbo ~ February 12, 1911

lrg_campanileTo Charles Augustus Strong
COLONIAL CLUB
Cambridge, Massachusetts. February 12, 1911

Thank you very much for repeating your generous offers; my plans about retirement continue unchanged; that is, I expect to leave (either resigning formally or getting an indefinite leave of absence) a year from next June, i.e. in June 1912. This summer I am sorry to say I shan’t see you, because I am going to California to give some lectures at Berkeley; the proposal came just in time, for if they had waited another year, it would have been too late. As it is, it seemed too pat to be refused; it gives me a chance of seeing the West for nothing and making a sort of farewell tour of the country.

By the time I retire I hope to have $2500 a year of my own; my unmarried sister (who is far better off) has offered to share her superfluities with me; so you see I shall be opulent according to my standards. Nevertheless I gladly accept your offers of a helping hand in spirit, and in fact also, if circumstances should require or justify it. You have eighteen months in which to make up your mind and experiment in places and houses; if you have settled down when I am free, I will come to make you a long visit, and we might (if your house was large enough) share it in a sense, if you would set aside a room for me where I might leave my books and other small belongings, and where I might come every year for a season. During my first winter– and you would probably be in Switzerland– I want to spend several months in Madrid, where I know I can be comfortable and amused at an old spinter friend’s. Then I am longing to revisit Italy; and my plan of writing a critical history of philosophy may take me to Oxford, London, & Paris, in order to have a large library to work in. But this consultation of books would (as you may well imagine) not be systematic, so that the greater part of my composition could be done in the wilderness, and would probably be all the better, as to tone and perspective, for being done there.

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book Two, 1910-1920.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2001.
Location of manuscript: Rockefeller Archive Center, Sleepy Hollow NY

Page 160 of 274

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén