The Works of George Santayana

Category: LETTERS Page 2 of 274

Letters in Limbo ~ May 9, 1940

To Paul Arthur Schilpp
Hotel Danieli,
Venice. May 9, 1940

Dear Professor Schilpp

This is merely to report that I have now received Friess & Rosenthal’s essay, or rather dialogue. I am astonished to see how thoroughly these critics have read and pondered my rather casual effusions. It is only recently that such consideration is shown to me; formerly I was disregarded, and got quite used to it.

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book Six, 1937–1940.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2004.
Location of manuscript: Morris Library, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.

Letters in Limbo ~ May 8, 1906

Pau-CP-19To [Susan Sturgis de Sastre]
PAU.—VUE SUR LA CHAÎNE DES PYRÉNÉES.
Pau, May 8, 1906

I have found this place just what I wanted—delightfully warm and sunny, not too crowded, the gardens in full flower, snow mountains in sight, and nothing to do but stroll and scribble. These three days I have spent mostly in the parks, sitting on some bench, and either reading the papers or writing in my note-book things suggested by my recent discussions with Strong. It has been very nice and restful. Pau is a much more wonderful place than I remembered it to be—most luxuriant and grand at the same time. This photograph doesn’t do the view justice, as the mountains are much higher & nearer than they look here.

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book One, [1868]-1909.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2001.
Location of postcard manuscript: Collection of Paloma Sanchez Sastre, Madrid, Spain

Letters in Limbo ~ May 7, 1928

Rummell,_Richard_Harvard_UniversityTo George Sturgis
Hotel Bristol
Rome, May 7. 1928

The vagueness of the bequest to Harvard was intentional. It may be hard to find just the right man for the Fellowship even in the wide field of poetry, philosophy, theology, and the Harvard Lampoon: and when you remember that I hope to die a novelist, almost anyone not a chimney-sweep can hope for my legacy.

You are right about the reason for a Spanish child not having the same last name, although he has the same surname, as his father: the last is his mother’s family name. As to the middle name, as in the case of Manuela Ruiz de Santayana y Zabalgoitia, it is not necessary. Ruiz was originally our family name, Santayana being a place; but my father and his brothers got into the habit of using Santayana exclusively, for the sake of brevity. But the addition of the mother’s surname, now usually without the “y” prefixed, is legal, and necessary in a document. So you will find that your aunt’s will is signed “Susana Sturgis Borrás”. The Parkman is optional, and the husband’s name is not, in Spain, a wife’s name at all. She may be described as the wife, or politely, the lady, of so-and-so: but her name remains what it was originally. Calling your aunt, as she liked to be called, Susana Sturgis de Sastre, is not strictly correct; she was Doña Susana Sturgis y Borrás, señora de Sastre. The last words are a title or description, not a part of her name, as if you called me G. S, wedded to Metaphysics.

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book Four, 19281932.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003.
Location of manuscript: The Houghton Library, Harvard University, Cambridge MA

 

 

Letters in Limbo ~ May 6, 1923

To Charles Augustus Strong
New York Hotel,
Nice, France 6, 1923

It is warm but pleasant here. I am absorbed reading “My Life and Adventures” by Earl Russell. Elizabeth is simply not mentioned, nor his second divorce. Mollie figures as the Lady Russell. It looks as if he had gone back to his vomit.

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book Three, 1921–1927.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002.
Location of manuscript: Rockefeller Archive Center, Sleepy Hollow NY.

Letters in Limbo ~ May 5, 1948

StJohnsAshfield_StainedGlass_GoodShepherd_FaceTo Augusto Guzzo
Via Santo Stefano Rotondo, 6,
Rome, May 5, 1948

According to Catholic dogma, in Christ himself, in Jesus, God existed as in no other man. But I am not discussing that doctrine, but only the teaching of the Gospel (especially in John) that God and Christ himself will come to dwell within others, Christ’s disciples. Here it is evident that God and Christ are forms of thought and with which may be infused into other spirits. God is an ideal in them; whether he exists also hypostatically in himself, is a question of fact, objective information conveyed by faith and dogma, not a question of the complexion of spiritual life in a man when he or others say that God is dwelling in him.

…When I say that Christ, being God, can reflect the whole divine nature, I am talking of the idea of Christ as conceived by Christian faith. I think that a myth: what I think real is the ideal and partial presence of divine will and knowledge and love in human beings.

What you mean by “God humanised” is not clear to me. The divine nature in Christ, according to Christian faith, was not humanised: it remained simply divine. But it was conjoined with a human psyche, so that the latter became sacred, utterly united in intent, by faith and love, to the divine nature, yet preserving the temporal, successive, limited experience proper to a human being. And I should add, proper to existence itself. For the life of God in eternity is an idea only: it has moral reality, but does not designate an actual fulfilled existence. But this is an endless subject.

From The Letters of George Santayana:  Book Eight, 1948-1952.  Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.
Location of manuscript: Unknown

 

Page 2 of 274

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén